|
|
To elucidate the role of crystal polarity in LED operation, we compare the characteristics of the same AlGaN/InGaN/GaN multiple-quantum-well (MQW) heterostructure (see [project file Semi_polar_MQW_structure.sls or Non_polar_MQW_structure.sls] for details) assumed it to be grown on a Ga-faced, a semipolar or a non-polar substrate. Figs.1-6 show the band diagrams of these LEDs computed for the same current density through the diodes.
It is seen that in the Ga-faced structure, there is a barrier hindering the electron injection into the MQW active region. Substantially lower barrier is formed in the non-polar and semi-polar structures, as shown in Figs. 1-3. Furthermore the flat energy bands of non-polar and semi-polar GaN allow for the use of much thicker quantum wells. The absence of a built-in electric field in non-polar devices and positive polarization charge at the InGaN/GaN interface, considerably narrowing the space-charge region in n-GaN. Moreover, there is an excellent confinement of electrons in the alternative oriented structures due to the p-AlGaN and n-GaN barriers preventing the electron leakage from active region.
The distributions of charge concentration in quantum wells of the non-polar and semi-polar structures are more homogeneous and recombination is more efficient (Figs. 4-6. As a result, internal quantum efficiency of these structures is well above the IQE of conventional Ga-faced structure (Fig.7).
Some aspects of the choice of the growth surface orientation and detailed analysis of substrate orientation effect on LED operation can be found in the article by V.F. Mymrin, K.A. Bulashevich, N.I. Podolskaya and S.Yu. Karpov, “Bandgap engineering of electronic and optoelectronic devices on native AlN and GaN substrates: A modelling insight”, Journal of Crystal Growth Volume 281, Issue 1, 15 July 2005, Pages 115-124.







